At the 6th century BC, which I take as the last century of Antiquity, I am pausing to consider what will be developed for the Classical and Medieval period. First, I will begin taking Western Civilization as primary. It became more significant with the rise of Greek civilization and culture, and later on with Roman civilization and culture. In Asia, from this period on, Persian and Anatolian civilization and culture prevailed over Egyptian and Babylonian which prevailed through most of antiquity. I will also be looking more into India and China, and the peoples of Africa. The areas of social mechanics aren’t quite developed enough to pursue in depth, although they are getting closer. I had a vague notion that examination of religion would need to switch emphasis from pagan (particularly Asian pagan religion) to Asian religion: I now have a better idea of when and why to shift the emphasis. Local government and government activities and structure, economic systems and activity, and educational organization will also get more attention. Recreation and entertainment, and philosophy will also get more development in classical and medieval times.
In the examination of history, I find it important to maintain an appropriate balance among peoples of the world. During antiquity, the peoples of Asia were generally more developed than others, and in particular, those of the Middle East were most significant. At the period I am working on right now, the 11th century BC, Egypt and Mesopotamian peoples were the best developed, but Persian and Anatolian peoples were starting to become more significant. The peoples of India, China, and Central Asia and Southeast Asia were not as well developed, or not as well connected to other peoples of the world. European peoples were not as well developed, although Greek peoples were starting to appear.
Later on, in classical and medieval times, European peoples began to become more significant, and in modern times, European peoples have had an outsized influence on the rest of the world. Tracing how and why this came about is part of the story of humanity. This is not to say that other peoples were insignificant, but trying find an appropriate balance and discover the patterns of social development is not a trivial task. In earlier developments of my knowledge base, I was focused too heavily on the modern size of nations, which is certainly not a good guide when working in the more distant past.
Most of my notes on antiquity are centered around Egypt, although in the current pass, I have managed to link to Mesopotamian peoples, (Babylon and Assyria). I am also working with Balkan peoples, specifically Greek peoples of Greece and Cyprus. Egyptian cities are being connected. I am also gradually expanding my links to areas of social mechanics. I have made some progress on religion and have linked pagan religions (in general) and Asiatic religion. Getting Abrahamic religion linked to antiquity is also a goal, national government and law.
I have also been working in modern history, and here, progress is more advanced. I am working on getting the industrial revolution linked, particularly the first or early industrial revolution, and on the next pass, will be doing more with the second (or middle) industrial revolution, which began in about the 1870s, and the computer (or late industrial ) revolution, which began in about the 1940s. I am linking Catholicism and have the popes identified to the mid 19th century, and am working on the history and major divisions of Protestantism. For government, I am linking colonial empires and about to start traditional empires and links to warfare. I am also making progress on elements of culture, and should soon start more links to mathematics. These are areas that I have been wanting to get to for sometimes, and it’s good to see that I am starting to make progress.
I have seen this quote fairly often of late.
“Of all tyrannies, a tyranny sincerely exercised for the good of its victims may be the most oppressive. It would be better to live under robber barons than under omnipotent moral busybodies. The robber baron’s cruelty may sometimes sleep, his cupidity may at some point be satiated; but those who torment us for our own good will torment us without end for they do so with the approval of their own conscience. They may be more likely to go to Heaven yet at the same time likelier to make a Hell of earth. This very kindness stings with intolerable insult. To be “cured” against one’s will and cured of states which we may not regard as disease is to be put on a level of those who have not yet reached the age of reason or those who never will; to be classed with infants, imbeciles, and domestic animals.” C. S. Lewis. God in the Dock: Essays on Theology and
I know a thing or two about living under that kind of tyranny. I was raised in a domestic version, and dealt with many another who has attempted the methods of punishment, belittlement, and persecution to compel me to do things, ostensibly for my own good. I know about whipping, shaming, insults and name-calling, and threats, and about being hectored, bullyragged, and ostracised. Without going into a great deal more of personal experience and hardship and how I learned it, I have learned a thing or two about how to resist that kind.
The first thing to realize is that those who act in this way are not principally motivated by your good. They are more often interested in their own, and recognizing what their self-interest is, when they are so assiduously pretending an interest in your welfare, or that of others is a key part of effective resistance. They may not even consciously realize what their interest really is.
Second is a recognition that since their methods don’t work on you, returning the same on them won’t work on them, either. Kindness is more powerful than cruelty, truth is more powerful than lies, knowledge beats ignorance, reality beats pretense, and patience beats haste.
The third is that it takes courage to stand your ground. Anyone can throw a return punch, but only a strong man, or woman, can take a beating to accomplish a higher purpose. If you have that higher purpose firmly in mind, you can be bedrock solid and no one will have power over you without your consent.
This is a review of and personal reaction to the recently popular limited series that has been shown on Netflix, “The Queen’s Gambit”.
At one time I participated in a couple of chess tournaments and associated with the BYU chess club, so I am familiar with the game. Seeing a series about a chess player captivated my interest, so I watched it. Binge-watched it, in fact, three times and have since watched several series of review-and-reaction videos, and other commentary from participants. It caught my interest like few other shows have ever done. I’ll try to provide as few spoilers as possible.
“The Queen’s Gambit”, based on the book by Walter Tevis, portrays a female orphan chess prodigy who rises to compete at the highest levels of tournament chess, and with the World Champion, in the 1960s.
But, as the director and lead actress have both stated, it isn’t really about chess. It’s about the personal struggles of the main character, Elizabeth (or, as she prefers to be called, Beth) Harmon.
To cover my bases, I’ll first register my criticisms. First, obviously, this is a work of fiction…no such person really existed. However, she appears to be somewhat based on or inspired by Bobby Fischer, who was active during the same period covered by the series, and there are some notable parallels. Second, the chess world was and still is dominated by male players, and the series appears to underplay the discrimination and sexism that existed (and still do), in the world of serious chess competition. Positive relations with her various defeated opponents are seldom as good as they were for her. Third, Beth is portrayed as dealing with the problems of tranquilizer abuse and alcoholism, and I believe both the effect on her chess play and the difficulty in overcoming them are also underplayed. Fourth, her victories come a little more easily than is realistic. More losses and more draws would be normal. The earnings she gets from winning tournaments seen to be unrealistically high. Fifth, this is not a series for those who have serious objections to portrayals of profanity, drug or alcohol abuse, or sexual promiscuity. She has sexual relations with three different men, without being married to any of them and a near encounter with another. There is some nudity (none of it full) and more is implied than actually shown. There is a swimming pool scene and a couple of drunken romps in her underwear. Christianity is not portrayed positively, although the pretensions versus the reality of the orphanage where she was raised from age nine to fifteen make that understandable.
On the positive side, Beth is portrayed as a chess prodigy, and her various abilities, notably the ability to recall and play entire games in her mind without seeing the chessboard, are actually not uncommon among highly-ranked players. I have not read the book it is based on, but those who have report remarkable fidelity, although with a few changes. The series benefited significantly from the advice of Bruce Pandolfini, a noted teacher who was portrayed in “Searching for Bobby Fisher” and from the assistance of grandmaster and former world champion Gary Kasparov, who took great pains to be sure that the chess was accurate and correct. From the chess sets, boards, and clocks, through the actual moves, positions, and games, (all the games were real from start to finish though none was shown in its entirety) to the settings and conduct of tournaments and adjournments, and on to the characterization of American, European, and Soviet chess and chess players, all were made as realistic as possible for the period. (Kasparov was actually offered the role of the world champion in the series but declined.) There are a few errors, but overall, it was very well done. The cinematography was excellent and the costumes lovely. Combined with the acting and musical score, it portrayed the intense internal excitement and passion (although not the speed…) of a chess match with high fidelity.
Even though the chess was as accurate as possible, the major focus was not on the board, but on the players. Beth was principally played by Anya Taylor-Joy, who reported that she would memorize the moves of a game just before shooting and treat them as choreography for her fingers, rather than try to play out a game with full understanding of what was going on, which to me is as remarkable a feat of memory as anything her character could do over the board.
But since this series is more about the human struggle than the chess, let me move on with four more reasons I enjoyed it. First, although Harmon is naturally gifted, she does not succeed without adding hard work and dedication. She accumulates a library of chess books and uses it. At one point, she drops a mention of needing to study eight hours a day, which is reasonable for a professional. She can only go so far on her own talents. Two of her former competitors turned coaches insist that she needs to study yet more if wants to defeat the World Champion. To her credit, she does the work.
Second, as her first teacher observes at one point, her gift comes with a cost, the other side of the same coin. Although he doesn’t specify what that cost is, it is evident that she has difficulty fitting in with society. She is introverted, uncommunicative, likes being alone, goes through a period of being teased about her clothes, and has few people she can trust. Distinct from her talent for chess, she is highly intelligent and observant, and has some of the impatience and tendency to make uncomfortably pointed observations that often come with it. Her obsession with chess interferes badly with her social adjustment. She observes that the chessboard is a limited world with rules she understands, where she can feel safe and in control, where if she is hurt, she has only herself to blame. There are reasons for her use of pills and alcohol, although they do have a serious downside. That rings true. While I don’t have identical gifts, I do have some that are at times burdensome. While I don’t have problems with pills or alcohol, I have weaknesses and dysfunctional behavior that appears to be driven by similar things. There are reasons why genius and madness are so often linked.
Third, she does not succeed without help. From a loving but mentally unstable birth mother, through the janitor who taught her the game, to her best friend in the orphanage, to her adoptive mother, to her fellow players and former competitors who become her coaches, at critical opponents she is is helped along the way, through various and severe losses, disappointments, and setbacks.
And, finally… spoiler alert… she wins. Not only does she ultimately give up the drugs and alcohol, but she wins on the chessboard, too. As Beth would say, it’s beautiful.
I have been giving most of my attention to ancient history, but in my overall development scheme, I have decided to return to recent and current events.
New Year’s Day is often a time for a fresh start. In my Knowledge Base, it signals not only a new month, quarter, and year, but a new 5 year period, and a new 20 year period. I have so far considered the early 21st century (2001 to 2020) as part of the 20th century, but the early mid 21st century is beginning, which is my signal to begin considering the 21st century in its own right, separate from the 20th.
For the early 21st century, I have a summary of current major world leaders, but have not yet identified the most important events, and need to look more closely at the periods. The late 2010s, including the last 5 years, are in a similar state.
I want to examine the United States more closely, but I am still lacking summaries of the most recent events in sufficient detail. More detailed analysis of social changes and types is still lacking. Although most attention is given in my news summaries to political events, I am trying to give more weight to religion.
For entertainment purposes in the past few months, I have been reading a mixture of fantasy and romantic suspense. I intend to slow down and work on my own fiction.
For gaming, I was playing The Sims 4 for a while but have switched to Elite: Dangerous, and have an exploration and development program in progress.
I have recently watched “The Queen’s Gambit” on Netflix. This has become one of my personal favorites. As the director and leading actress both observed, this is not so much about chess as it is a human struggle. I do play chess and have competed in a few tournaments, and followed it for a number of years. I am no Beth Harmon or any other chess prodigy, although I am still trying to improve my game. I don’t have issues of being an orphan or of alcohol or drug abuse, but I do have my own personal issues which have led me to recognize the kind of obsession and isolation that she struggles with in the series.
For various reasons, I am resuming a program of personal organization that I began last year and more and more or less gave up on. I’m starting to review it and pick it back up again.
I decided to backtrack for a while, working in prehistory and early antiquity. At present I am working in early classical times. This is being connected to the 16th century. In the Middle east, I have references to Egypt and Persia, although by the 3rd century BC Egypt was increasingly under foreign rule. In Europe, I have references to Balkan, Latin, and Germanic peoples, which gives something of a framework for studies of classical antiquity. I also have references to pagan religion, with developing references to Asian religion, which will be useful when I go into more detail in India and Persia. Particular governments and government activity are also connected, although not yet well applied.
I have been repeatedly working in the earlier periods of antiquity. The 20th century is now connected to the centuries of antiquity, although the historical development of archaeology in the century is too large a subject to handle easily. The 19th century is being connected, and during this period, Middle Eastern archaeology began to develop, whereas it had previously mostly been limited to Europe. I have taken information from the earlier (web) version of my Knowledge base to extend the history of Egypt back to the 30th century BC. I am working on Mesopotamian history as relevant, although since this has had less influence on modern history, I have a long way to go back from the 19th century. Middle Eastern cities are reasonably well connected. and I am connecting South Asian cities. I have Oriental peoples connected most of the way through antiquity, and I am now working on connecting Central Asian peoples. Balkan peoples are now connected most of the way through antiquity, and I am working on connecting Latin peoples. Although Balkan cities are not presently large enough to include in my city list, they were more important anciently and are being connected. Once the South Asian cities are sufficiently connected back, I should be able to resume attention to social change and types.
For particular religions, I am focusing on connecting Pagan religion through classical and medieval times. and the general topic of religious belief through antiquity. A more detailed study of religion may come when I have more specific nations and cities to considered. The topic of particular governments is well connected through antiquity, and government activity is being connected. The more detailed study of government will also come when I have more specific nations and cities.
Most recently I have been doing a review of modern history, and connecting more specific and smaller nations to it. I have also done a similar review of the 16th century. For the specific periods of the 16th century, I have not progressed much beyond the Ottoman Empire and Egypt. Although European exploration of the world was progressing, I don’t yet have details of specific nations. I have been doing more with connecting peoples to cities, and areas of social mechanics, and particularly to Abrahamic religion.
I started this one in the early 2nd millennium BC, and I have worked so far up to early medieval history. Going this far back has put new emphasis on Persian peoples as a division of Middle Eastern peoples, and on Balkan peoples in Western Civilization. Persia proper, or Iran, will start to get better connected: I don’t yet have specifics much further back than the 1979 Iranian revolution, but this will definitely fill out some big gaps in Middle Eastern history. I have long been wanting to get Latin peoples back as far as the Roman empire, and that’s finally happening. Getting more of Germanic peoples back through medieval times will also be helpful.